The Educator's PLN

The personal learning network for educators

Avoiding Cheating and Plagiarism in an Online Course

Devices will not save us – IP validating and web video cams.  Here is what we must do:

Embrace the 21st century in which student assignments are project based collaborative pieces and testing assessment is the open e-resource exam (akin to the open book exam).

1. Collaboration eliminates copying  as students hold each other accountable for parts of the assignment or for equal input into an assignment.  Google docs for collaborative composition and Prezi for organizing data are two Web 2.0 tools that lend themselves to these types of assignments. Discussion board postings, which synthesize ideas of the collective group,  challenge plagiarists as students cannot copy from one another — there is a thread and the posts are in plain sight (identical postings would obviously jump out at the instructor).  If teachers pose a prompt or topic thread that requires authentic thinking – see my Hamlet and Machiavelli’s The Prince example below – then the instructor is likely to get original work from students.

2. Open e-resources exams emphasize critical thinking, demonstration of skills in use of data, and analysis of readily available e-resources.  Information/data at one’s fingertips means higher level thinking skills will be engaged. The “test” has to be designed with this in mind.  Data will be absorbed more thoughtfully in application and analysis.  This will mean secondary education assessments will be more aligned with higher education assessments.

Sources of plagiarism (pun intended) sometimes rest with the instructor:  we need to rethink assignments.

My AP English 4H students are currently analyzing Prince Hamlet through a Machiavellian lens (synthesizing Machiavelli’s The Prince and Shakespeare’sHamlet).  One complexity is the assignment is inherently flawed:  I want my students to identify this flaw as they move through this assignment — on wikispaces as discussion board postings.  They will take academic risks, they will collaborate, and they will explore their authentic understandings of both texts.  This is an open e-resource exam.  I expect them to have an e-copy of Machiavelli’s text (via Project Gutenberg)  and an e-copy of Shakespeare’s text to cull evidence from as they work on this assignment.  I insist they do so because I am requiring quotes and details in support of interpretations and connections.

Let us cultivate academic risk-taking beyond mere memorization of data.

Views: 117

Comment

You need to be a member of The Educator's PLN to add comments!

Join The Educator's PLN

About

Thomas Whitby created this Ning Network.

Latest Activity

Profile Iconjenifer vanquez, Robert Roberts and Stacy Wilner joined The Educator's PLN
yesterday
David Chiles posted a status
"Don't eat with your phone on the table. It's proper Netiquette."
Monday
Linda Maree Stiller updated their profile
Sunday
Bridgette Bellows is now a member of The Educator's PLN
Saturday
Profile Icondaisymurphy, Wendie Ward, Erin Kaye Oaks and 1 more joined The Educator's PLN
Friday
John Braswell posted a blog post

Quantum physics - Popper's experiment

IntroductionBefore reading this hub I would advise reading these 2 hubs the sections stated as this will help with the understanding of this hub.The Double Split Experiment – Read section on Copenhagen interpretationBells Inequality Experiment – Section on Quantum Entanglement…See More
Aug 10
John Braswell is now a member of The Educator's PLN
Aug 9
Profile IconJessica Stepaniak and Hugh Beaulac joined The Educator's PLN
Aug 8

Awards And Nominations

© 2017   Created by Thomas Whitby.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service