The Educator's PLN

The personal learning network for educators

Bloom’s Taxonomy: Bitter honey for a language teacher

Bloom’s Taxonomy:

Bitter honey for a language teacher

by Leslie Simonfalvi, director


International Teacher Training

& Development College


Quite a few years ago. a friendly American Foundation sent some 500 to 800 teenage students to Budapest, Hungary every summer for 10 years, as part of the Student Ambassador Programme. The students were hand-picked from all the 50 States and they came in groups of 25 to 30. Every group was accompanied by 4 to 5 teachers, also hand-picked from all the States from Alaska to Florida.


The program included London, Rome and Budapest and the main aim was to stay here for a week, learn as much as humanly possible about the local, and through that about the European Culture, and then go home and disseminate what you have learned in your school, in your town, or in a wider community.


The programme was extremely popular both with the Guests, and with the Hosts, in the Budapest leg the students, the teachers, and the non-teaching staff of the International Language School Group. We were doing a massive Russian Teacher Re-Training Programme at the time, and the re-trainees had a unique chance of meeting decent native speakers of English in a one-week live-in arrangement.

The Guests were living with the families of the students, the trainees, their teachers, and the whole staff.


As part of the programme, we took them round in Budapest to see the sights and learn about the history, the geography, and many other aspects of the culture of the place, all wrapped up in tales and anecdotes, and myths to make it more memorable for the Guests, and more interesting for their then future listeners back  home.


We did the same at more places in Hungary in coach trips and boat trips to old kings’ seats and places of famous battles. We even had quiz-shows: about Hungary and Europe for the Guests, about the USA, Canada, and the Americas for the Hungarians, and about general knowledge for mixed groups. It was great fun and I cannot tell how much we all laughed.


As the director of the International Language School Group, I met all the students and all the teachers. and I had many of the teachers as visitors in my classes. They were very interested in how we teach English to our students to make them so confident communicators in a foreign language. They tried to relate our techniques and methods to their own, and they also had many good questions. I guess both parties learned a great deal from the exchange, and it is most definitely true for me.


There was one buzz-word that came up from practically all American teachers, and I could not make head or tail of it. It was the Bloom’s Taxonomy, and, most sincerely, I had never heard of it. As a teacher and teacher trainer, I was quite well at home in TESOL, i. e. Teaching English for Speakers of Other Languages, and I was quite sure that the Bloom’s Taxonomy had not entered the realm of language teaching.


I knew nothing about it, but the frequency with which the American teachers mentioned it made it felt like a panacea, the solution to all the educational world’s problems. The more I heard about it, the more interested I grew. It was very clear from the outset that it was not worked out for language teaching, what is more, with language teaching in mind among all other subjects.


I had a very strong feeling that the teacher and the teaching are sort of left out if the Taxonomy starts with Knowledge. It was not a general criticism since I knew quite well that there are opposite requirements in learning anything in L1, i. e. the mother tongue, and learning L2, i. e. a second- or foreign language, through anything.


In the first case, you ’know’ the medium of communication, and you learn new information, facts and figures, concepts and relationships through that medium.


In the second case, you have some ’knowledge’ of the world around you, and through that knowledge you learn a new medium for communication, i. e. for the communication of old knowledge through the new medium, but also some new knowledge through the new medium.


All in all, the Bloom’s Taxonomy has not entered the field of TESOL and the main reasons for this are as follows:

·       it starts late, neglecting steps that are unique for language learning,

·       finishes early, without saving knowledge and understanding for use in higher categories,

·       shows continuity where there is a gap,

·       disregards two important types of students,

·       the artist, who would not willingly spend time for analysis, and

·       the language mathematician, who would want to analyse anything any time before, and quite often instead of anything else, and

·       it handles the developmental steps in the affective and  psychomotor domains as distinct from the cognitive.


I had a strong feeling that the Bloom’s Taxonomy, if we manage to complement it according to the missing links above, might give us a new insight into what we are doing, to be able to do it better and develop further. It might also give us a chance to extend our teaching to groups of students we were not able to teach, or else were not able to teach well enough before, i. e.

·       drop-out students,

·       physically handicapped students,

·       the LD Child,

·       the Concrete Child,

·       mild cases of autism,

·       students with the Asperger Syndrome,

·       students with the Pragmatic – Semantic Disorder, and

·       mild cases of mentally handicapped students.


It is also very important to apply all our new insights in the teacher training and development.


Because of this I started to analyse our teaching and teacher training in relation to, among others, the Bloom’s Taxonomy. Over the years, I have found 14 Problems, i. e. points that are most definitely problem-spots in language teaching, but may or may not be problems in the teaching of other subjects.


The solutions to these 14 Problems add up to 14 Theses and the material related to this fills a DVD. It is enough for a 200-hour series of workshops, or three semesters in teacher training.


It has been tried in Hungary, Italy, Belgium, Wales, and the Netherlands, and also in the Africa Project in Islington, London, UK. It has always worked where teachers and trainers really wanted to change and were ready to apply a new paradigm.

Views: 875


You need to be a member of The Educator's PLN to add comments!

Join The Educator's PLN

Comment by David Deubelbeiss on January 3, 2011 at 12:18pm



Like you - in general I've always been dismayed at how isolated TESOL is from the general academic and research areas of education. A pity. Nunan long ago in the Learner Centered Curriculum lamented this but I've not noted much progress. I meet academics in language who are very ignorant of basic principles of education - especially special education. Our profession needs to get out a little more!


About Bloom's. I think for TESOL, it would be quite a bit flatter. Teaching a language is qualitatively different than teaching a "subject" which is more knowledge based / focused. You can do a lot with a little bit of knowledge in language. However, in a subject, you first need that knowledge/comprehension in order to do more of the higher levels of processing a la Bloom. 


Just my feeling.... but I think all teachers, especially those in TESOL , should consider their actions through Bloom's framework. Especially TESOL, given the focus on higher levels of the hierarchy in SLA (second lang. acquisition).



Comment by Leslie Simonfalvi on January 3, 2011 at 9:30am

Thank you for your comments and thank you for your advice.


Please do not misread me. I respect Bloom and I like his Taxonomy. I also like the Revised Taxonomy, the New Taxonomy, DOK, and the Digital Taxonomy.


I am a loving critic. I do not want to suggest that I am right. I only suggest that I think differently.


And thank you again.

Comment by Colleen Young on January 3, 2011 at 8:45am

I second Norbert's recommendation to look at Bloom's digital taxonomy, in particular at Andrew Church's wiki which is where the pdf Norbert refers to is.


I have become very interested in this myself and put all the links I had on this page for staff at my school.

Comment by Norbert Kiprop Boruett on January 3, 2011 at 4:31am

As a medical educationists we have promoted the use of Blooms taxonomy as a an avenue of facilitating helping student teachers distinguish higher order thinking skills from lower order thinking skills.Later when i divided into e learning i encountered the Blooms digital taxonomy and i think it would fit into the the teaching of languages well. Much as i am not an language specialist have a look at it-'s+Digital+taxonomy+...



Thomas Whitby created this Ning Network.

Latest Activity

Shawn Mitchell replied to Rob Schoonveld's discussion Twitter vs Edupln
"My preference is this website is best. Twitter is used for social purpose and EDUPLN is used for professional discussion which you cannot discuss on social platforms."
Shawn Mitchell replied to Shanshan Ma's discussion Personalized learning network and social media
"Hi, There are too many platforms of social media and the member of those platform discuss so many things and participate. So it depends only on you where do you want to discuss."
Shawn Mitchell replied to Nanacy Lin's discussion Future Of Education
"Now a days AI is best technology to learn because it is the future."
Apr 12
Joe Silva updated their profile
Apr 11
Profile IconStuart Jones, Sarah Kiefer, Corina Gamez and 5 more joined The Educator's PLN
Apr 11
Vivi Hamilou updated their profile
Mar 20
Vivi Hamilou posted a blog post

We’ve got news for you!

EfxeiNewsPoli, Issue 1, Primary School of Efxeinoupoli, Greece“We’ve got news for you” is the title of the eTwinning project we are involved in this year with the 4th, 5th and 6th learners of the …See More
Mar 20
andy mellor updated their profile
Feb 17


© 2021   Created by Thomas Whitby.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service