The Educator's PLN

The personal learning network for educators

I have long concerned myself with the notion of grading, its need, it accuracy, and its future.  Grading is a long standing, though never ending, train every teacher must have an engine for and a caboose that always comes last.

»Why grade

If grading is such a drudgery, why do teachers take so much time doing it?  In part, it is part of the job.  The greater need to grade is knowing how well students are performing.

»Learning is continuum

A grade is supposed to give feedback to the student about how his/her progress.  Notice progress is a key word meaning continuum.  Every grade a child receives on work is mostly directed back as a number.  That number is supposed to indicate to the child his or her score.  I contend that the score is arbitrary because of the teacher.  To grade work out of ten seems negligent to me.  The negligence comes not in the number but in the willingness of an educator to design the learning backwards, and in backwards planning the end state of learning is first described as goals and the goals drive the instruction and assessment.  I am not sure this is what really happens because I am guilty of this myself, so I am being self critical of my own practice.  If the design is sound and the learning plan is sound, then the assessment, formative or summative, is substantiated and a learning continuum is generated.  Yet, if the end learning state is not described ahead of time for what a student is supposed to do, then the entire process is flawed.

»Ain't nothin new

What I am saying isn't anything new, but what I do believe there is a much better way to assess student growth.  When was the last time you were a number and someone said to you that your learning was a number?  As I went through school, I used to see numbers on my tests and homework never knowing quite what it meant other than I did well or not so well.  Learning cannot be quantified and for years the prescribed practice is to quantify as numbers.  What really is 56% of learning, or 100% of learning?  Isn't that the ability to give a teacher an answer they want to see as being correct.  So why not say I earned a 100% of what teachers wanted to see?  That sounds much more reasonable and that, in my opinion, is what grading has come to.

»Enter standardized tests

I can hear a family talking about how the son or daughter or both didn't make the cut off score for a state given test in which there were only two hours afforded to demonstrate an entire year, or years, worth of learning.  The family is likely to feel shame and the child is feeling worthless and dreading coming back to school because now they have to meet with intervention specialists to help them pass the test.  Don't pass that up too them pass the test.  Not learn.  Pass the test.  How is our system of education able to justify quantifying the total sum of a student's learning in one year in one test just to prove they can pass the test?   Tests can't, but somehow it is said they do.  I teach where the entire focus of a school year is teaching to a test with with little windfall focus on learning (my opinion, not my district's).  Learning is about being led, coached, inspired, frustrated, and challenged to think differently, creatively, innovatively, and authentically.

»Points stink, talent is better

Points, unless there is a 1:1 correlation to work or assessment, are arbitrary and the vague meaning of those points leads to the real confusion about what kids really know, and parents to have a false sense about their child's true ability.  For years I sat in conferences saying to parents, "This is really how your child performs..."  Pause a moment to think:  every year a child goes to a new teacher, who has to learn a child, the child has to learn the teacher, and the entire year is a sprint to get through curriculum.  Sound right?  This is based on points but I, and you, don't live life by earning points.  We live life by working to get better and when we take time to work at getting better, our competence grows, and when our competence grows, we are developing our talent in that area.  A talent based model would serve as a better platform for describing learning vs. quantifying.  Lets develop talent based measures that describe how kids are really performing in relation to learning goals that cause critical thinking, creativity, and innovation.  These measures, or rubrics, help us measure growth over time when applied with repeated instance.  Now we have a better profile of the student as a learner and not as a student as a score.

Views: 38


You need to be a member of The Educator's PLN to add comments!

Join The Educator's PLN


Thomas Whitby created this Ning Network.

Latest Activity

Shyamoli Shah shared their blog post on Facebook
3 hours ago
Shyamoli Shah liked Shyamoli Shah's blog post Which students loan should I avail?
3 hours ago
Shyamoli Shah posted a blog post

Which students loan should I avail?

Unlike earlier, these days there are hundreds of alternatives available in the market to avail students loan. Since there are so many options present today, it can be confusing for the borrower to choose the one that suits his requirements. This type of loan can be helpful when you do not have enough financial backup to bear with your educational expenses. With the extremely high cost of education in the present day, availing a loan seems to be the only wise way to get through your studies.A…See More
3 hours ago
William Morris posted a blog post

5 Common Problems Every has With First Job

There is an art how to solve the problems at work without creating more problems in the field of the work. There are few things you can do so consider your decision. You can ignore it or you live with it, or the other option is that you can start looking for the another job, or the other option is that you can talk to your boss and someone at work who can help youDespite the issues you're having, if you really like your occupation, it's certainly worth a shot at attempting to determine the…See More
10 hours ago
Profile IconAdela Belin, Shell Spina, Joelle and 1 more joined The Educator's PLN
12 hours ago
Profile IconNikhil Pandey, Ryan Boulter and Daniel Muise joined The Educator's PLN
Mark William posted a blog post

Online Diploma In Information Technology To Shape The Destiny Of Existing Traditional Education

The prelude to online education, as a new method of learning, has become quite an excitement among to the learners and working professionals who seek to take their career to a new horizon. No matter what part of the world a learner exists in or what academic backdrop he possesses as long a the student has the desire to enhance himself online education is the route which he can always find available.Image Courtesy: you take an…See More
Julia Galkina joined Shelly Terrell's group


Join this group to extend the discussion of edchat topics!

Awards And Nominations

© 2016   Created by Thomas Whitby.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service